Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

VIKING LINE AB
Ships5
CO₂ emitted215 kt
Fuel per mile144 kg/nm
Average speed15.8 kn
CO₂ at berth5.9%
Ships burning LNG2
Main segmentRo-pax

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Ro-pax

CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 547

  • VIKING LINE AB110 (−80%)
  • ← betterworse →

CO₂ per transport work (freight) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 233

  • VIKING LINE AB397 (+70%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer work (pax)vs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
VIKING LINE AB5110
397 freight
−80%
+70% freight
14415.86,3945.9%2
Segment median 547
233 freight
0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
VIKING LINE ABVerifavia (5)0%0%100%0%

VIKING LINE AB: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
VIKING XPRS9375654Ro-pax131 g CO₂/pax·nm
397 g CO₂/t·nm freight
547
233
−76%
+70%
17.941,522 t€1.2m
VIKING CINDERELLA8719188Ro-pax118 g CO₂/pax·nm
519 g CO₂/t·nm freight
547
233
−78%
+123%
14.742,881 t€532k
GABRIELLA8917601Ro-pax110 g CO₂/pax·nm
490 g CO₂/t·nm freight
547
233
−80%
+110%
15.746,758 t€474k
VIKING GLORYLNG9827877Ro-pax65.0 g CO₂/pax·nm
210 g CO₂/t·nm freight
547
233
−88%
−10%
15.639,573 t€614k
VIKING GRACELNG9606900Ro-pax64.0 g CO₂/pax·nm
218 g CO₂/t·nm freight
547
233
−88%
−6%
15.743,835 t€648k

30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.