Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GRYF

IMO
8818300
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency
EEXI 23.51 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
82.7 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−45%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,287
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+127%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
126
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−50%)
Average speed
13.6 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−14%)
Fuel per day at sea
27.0 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,517 t
CO₂ emitted
14,129 t
14,351 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
54,594 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,015 h
167 days, 46% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 82.7 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−45%)
69.3Ranks 64 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 15.8 (−14%)
12.0Faster than 26% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,287.09 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+127%)
66.76Ranks 341 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 125.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−50%)
48.59Ranks 119 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports85%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU15%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (14,129 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
15.4%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • GRYF
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • GRYF
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • GRYF
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • GRYF
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.1 kn−3%−2%−4%−11%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+0.0 kn−1%−1%−7%−67%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023+0.1 kn+5%+5%+7%+13%Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+0.8 kn−1%+5%+3%+1%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.8 kn−8%−13%−5%+85%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020+0.0 kn+4%+4%+1%+12%Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019+0.1 kn+2%+3%−6%+10%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.4,51714,12954,5944,01513.682.7––
2024Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.4,85015,32056,8664,21613.585.3––
2023not published5,28816,69861,1524,54313.586.5––
2022not published4,74014,96957,3304,28613.482.7––
2021not published4,62414,60155,5024,40412.683.3––
2020not published5,30716,75858,6304,37413.490.5––
2019not published5,06916,00558,1554,32513.487.2––
2018not published5,27116,64161,6634,62213.385.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.1,287.09566.51+127%341 of 408125.69253.18−50%DNVA
2024Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.1,444.12546.68+164%340 of 404153.93232.85−34%DNVA
2023not published4,404.77680.04+548%383 of 386152.09233.94−35%DNVA
2022not published3,913.91626.32+525%388 of 394124.57252.90−51%DNVA
2021not published3,878.41815.19+376%364 of 377147.42226.00−35%DNVA
2020not published2,097.36750.91+179%336 of 38781.14217.49−63%DNVA
2019not published1,873.86569.03+229%362 of 39467.87222.56−70%DNVA
2018not published1,705.75728.92+134%286 of 36160.23184.05−67%DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

GRYF (IMO 8818300): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze