Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

ISLE OF INNISFREE

IMO
8908466
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency
EEXI 30.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
CALAIS SEAWAYS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Matrix Ship Management LTD

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
183.6 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+22%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
532
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−6%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
500
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+98%)
Average speed
15.5 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−2%)
Fuel per day at sea
68.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
15,547 t
CO₂ emitted
48,647 t
49,411 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
84,689 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,461 h
228 days, 62% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 183.6 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+22%)
69.3Ranks 304 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 15.8 (−2%)
12.0Faster than 45% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 532.46 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−6%)
66.76Ranks 195 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 500.22 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+98%)
48.59Ranks 275 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU49%
  • Into the EU46%
  • At berth in the EU4%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (25,318 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.8 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • ISLE OF INNISFREE
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • ISLE OF INNISFREE
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ISLE OF INNISFREE
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • ISLE OF INNISFREE
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+1.0 kn+2%+9%+11%+8%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+0.6 kn−6%−2%+5%−5%0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.3 kn+2%−0%−3%+1,042%Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.2 kn+39%+41%+61%+44%Same speed, fuel per mile up 39%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.2 kn−35%−34%+5%−99%Same speed, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.2 kn+10%+9%−41%+109%Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.0 kn+3%+3%+1%−46%Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Matrix Ship Management LTD15,54748,64784,6895,46115.5183.6––
2024Matrix Ship Management LTD13,80843,42876,5135,27914.5180.5––
2023not published13,94144,06872,6695,22313.9191.8––
2022not published14,12845,09474,9125,27314.2188.6––
2021not published6,31619,83846,4653,31914.0135.9––
2020not published9,22628,89744,3673,21813.8207.9––
2019not published14,09544,15074,8625,34114.0188.3––
2018not published13,55042,42674,0275,27414.0183.0400.94–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Matrix Ship Management LTD532.46566.51−6%195 of 408500.22253.18+98%DNVB+C
2024Matrix Ship Management LTD491.12546.68−10%194 of 404497.73232.85+114%DNVB+C
2023not published519.30680.04−24%159 of 386489.78233.94+109%DNVB+C
2022not published45.47626.32−93%25 of 394560.77252.90+122%DNVB+C
2021not published31.54815.19−96%22 of 377377.13226.00+67%DNVB+C
2020not published3,221.89750.91+329%363 of 387215.40217.49−1%VerifaviaB
2019not published1,545.09569.03+172%343 of 394214.61222.56−4%VerifaviaB
2018not published2,837.37728.92+289%325 of 361–––VerifaviaB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.