Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MONTE D'ORO

IMO: 8911516
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Bastia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CORSICA LINEA

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

130

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

443

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (−39%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

513

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+179%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

46.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,577 t

CO₂ emitted

26,822 t

Distance sailed

65,769 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,458 h

186 days, 51% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 110 kg/nm · median 150 (−27%)

69.3Ranks 107 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 15.8 (−12%)

12.0Faster than 29% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 431 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−24%)

66.8Ranks 174 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 468 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+85%)

48.6Ranks 270 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,452 t

9.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MONTE D'ORO
Ro-pax median

100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MONTE D'ORO
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

MONTE D'ORO
Ro-pax median

100200300400500600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MONTE D'ORO
Ro-pax median

400500600700800900

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−5%	−8%	−14%	−4%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−8%	−7%	+128%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+6%	+0%	−58%	+29%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−3%	−1%	+25%	−15%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	−10%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−7%	−8%	−8%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−9%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CORSICA LINEA	5,500	17,528	50,087	3,598	13.9	110	–	–
2024	CORSICA LINEA	6,733	21,064	58,318	4,056	14.4	116	–	–
2023	not published	3,208	10,041	25,558	1,805	14.2	126	–	–
2022	not published	7,280	22,757	61,351	4,088	15.0	119	–	–
2021	not published	6,054	18,926	49,260	3,374	14.6	123	–	–
2020	not published	6,824	21,343	54,926	3,769	14.6	124	–	–
2019	not published	7,950	24,850	59,776	4,044	14.8	133	–	–
2018	not published	8,577	26,822	65,769	4,458	14.8	130	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	CORSICA LINEA	431	567	−24%	174 of 408	468	253	+85%	Verifavia	C
2024	CORSICA LINEA	449	547	−18%	184 of 404	471	233	+102%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	543	680	−20%	163 of 386	460	234	+97%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	422	626	−33%	154 of 394	436	253	+72%	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	498	815	−39%	151 of 377	541	226	+139%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	482	751	−36%	145 of 387	396	217	+82%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	504	569	−12%	181 of 394	419	223	+88%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	443	729	−39%	146 of 361	513	184	+179%	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.