Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

PAGLIA ORBA

IMO: 9050826
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Bastia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 31.54 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CORSICA LINEA

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

178

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

391

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (−38%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

436

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+72%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

72.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,999 t

CO₂ emitted

40,629 t

Distance sailed

73,169 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,303 h

179 days, 49% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 155 kg/nm · median 150 (+3%)

69.3Ranks 220 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 15.8 (−4%)

12.0Faster than 38% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 787 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+39%)

66.8Ranks 257 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 558 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+120%)

48.6Ranks 283 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,073 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PAGLIA ORBA
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PAGLIA ORBA
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

PAGLIA ORBA
Ro-pax median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

PAGLIA ORBA
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+1%	−0%	−23%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−4%	−5%	+8%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−10%	−18%	−17%	+133%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	+7%	+13%	+51%	−52%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−10%	−17%	−11%	+147%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+8%	+10%	−21%	−7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	−11%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CORSICA LINEA	7,846	24,603	50,708	3,362	15.1	155	–	–
2024	CORSICA LINEA	10,101	31,603	65,829	4,315	15.3	153	–	–
2023	not published	9,781	30,604	61,059	3,953	15.4	160	–	–
2022	not published	12,999	40,629	73,169	4,303	17.0	178	–	–
2021	not published	8,023	25,084	48,479	3,003	16.1	166	–	–
2020	not published	10,076	31,495	54,516	3,138	17.4	185	–	–
2019	not published	11,814	36,934	68,776	4,056	17.0	172	–	–
2018	not published	13,130	41,067	77,230	4,556	17.0	170	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	CORSICA LINEA	787	567	+39%	257 of 408	558	253	+120%	Verifavia	C
2024	CORSICA LINEA	929	547	+70%	274 of 404	489	233	+110%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	913	680	+34%	244 of 386	597	234	+155%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	391	626	−38%	148 of 394	436	253	+72%	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	815	815	+0%	189 of 377	433	226	+92%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	330	751	−56%	121 of 387	305	217	+40%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	356	569	−37%	139 of 394	284	223	+27%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	316	729	−57%	119 of 361	368	184	+100%	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.