Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

NORBANK

IMO: 9056583
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Rotterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

152

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

428

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

200

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (−10%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,873 t

CO₂ emitted

33,983 t

Distance sailed

71,551 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,264 h

219 days, 60% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2024

Set against all 404 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 131 kg/nm · median 151 (−13%)

73.1Ranks 146 of 404, lowest first237

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 15.7 (+0%)

11.7Faster than 50% of ro-pax ships22.4

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 3,425 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 547 (+527%)

58.4Ranks 376 of 404, lowest first1,957

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 257 g CO₂/t·nm · median 233 (+10%)

30.8Ranks 213 of 404, lowest first1,069

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,352 t

6.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORBANK
Ro-pax median

130.0140.0150.0160.0170.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

NORBANK
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

NORBANK
Ro-pax median

150175200225250275

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

NORBANK
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2024	+1.0 kn	−4%	+3%	+8%	+573%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+3%	+5%	+15%	−30%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−5%	−6%	−13%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−8%	−2%	−1%	+40%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	−6%	−14%	−5%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	3,216	10,107	27,657	1,784	15.5	116	–	–
2024	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	9,980	31,491	75,999	4,833	15.7	131	–	–
2022	not published	9,650	30,164	70,644	4,812	14.7	137	–	–
2021	not published	8,212	25,622	61,687	4,309	14.3	133	–	–
2020	not published	9,977	31,154	71,098	4,922	14.4	140	–	–
2019	not published	10,873	33,983	71,551	5,264	13.6	152	–	–
2018	not published	12,168	37,985	75,395	5,046	14.9	161	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2024	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	3,425	547	+527%	376 of 404	257	233	+10%	DNV	B
2022	not published	509	626	−19%	178 of 394	174	253	−31%	DNV	B
2021	not published	725	815	−11%	176 of 377	169	226	−25%	DNV	B
2020	not published	599	751	−20%	169 of 387	166	217	−24%	DNV	B
2019	not published	428	569	−25%	161 of 394	200	223	−10%	DNV	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.