Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

SKANIA

IMO: 9086588
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.44 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

145

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−7%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

248

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

112

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (−50%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,916 t

CO₂ emitted

31,247 t

Distance sailed

68,375 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,035 h

210 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 147 kg/nm · median 150 (−2%)

69.3Ranks 192 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 15.8 (−17%)

12.0Faster than 18% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 547 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−3%)

66.8Ranks 199 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 211 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−17%)

48.6Ranks 180 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,837 t

9.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SKANIA
Ro-pax median

145.0150.0155.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SKANIA
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

SKANIA
Ro-pax median

100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

SKANIA
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−2%	−4%	−5%	−10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+1%	+0%	+1%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+0%	−0%	+7%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−8%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	+4%	+72%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	−4%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−0%	+5%	+8%	−0%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.	9,453	29,438	64,312	4,899	13.1	147	–	–
2024	Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.	10,158	32,009	68,012	5,040	13.5	149	–	–
2023	not published	9,995	31,495	67,448	4,953	13.6	148	–	–
2022	not published	9,296	29,291	62,955	4,604	13.7	148	–	–
2021	not published	10,402	32,776	68,337	5,028	13.6	152	–	–
2020	not published	9,829	30,971	65,721	4,798	13.7	150	–	–
2019	not published	9,916	31,247	68,375	5,035	13.6	145	–	–
2018	not published	9,165	28,879	63,101	4,888	12.9	145	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.	547	567	−3%	199 of 408	211	253	−17%	DNV	A
2024	Polska Zegluga Morska P.P.	606	547	+11%	216 of 404	258	233	+11%	DNV	A
2023	not published	528	680	−22%	160 of 386	228	234	−3%	DNV	A
2022	not published	477	626	−24%	170 of 394	213	253	−16%	DNV	A
2021	not published	536	815	−34%	154 of 377	245	226	+8%	DNV	A
2020	not published	312	751	−58%	120 of 387	125	217	−43%	DNV	A
2019	not published	248	569	−56%	119 of 394	112	223	−50%	DNV	A
2018	not published	249	729	−66%	108 of 361	103	184	−44%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.