Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA JUTLANDICA

IMO: 9125944
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Gothenburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.66 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line Scandinavia AB · part of Stena

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

146

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

878

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

283

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (+54%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

50.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,805 t

CO₂ emitted

34,125 t

Distance sailed

73,897 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,170 h

215 days, 59% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 133 kg/nm · median 150 (−11%)

69.3Ranks 149 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 15.8 (−12%)

12.0Faster than 28% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 649 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+14%)

66.8Ranks 217 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 184 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−27%)

48.6Ranks 164 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,140 t

6.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STENA JUTLANDICA
Ro-pax median

130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STENA JUTLANDICA
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

STENA JUTLANDICA
Ro-pax median

100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

STENA JUTLANDICA
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	−2%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−11%	−16%	−6%	+1%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	+3%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−4%	−5%	+7%	−48%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+2%	+0%	−9%	−10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+5%	+11%	+10%	+139%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−1%	−0%	−4%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	9,575	29,908	71,849	5,181	13.9	133	–	–
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	10,089	31,853	73,004	5,256	13.9	138	–	–
2023	not published	12,090	38,169	78,040	5,310	14.7	155	–	–
2022	not published	11,268	35,566	75,643	5,123	14.8	149	–	–
2021	not published	10,993	35,245	70,875	4,748	14.9	155	–	–
2020	not published	11,792	37,380	77,865	5,097	15.3	151	–	–
2019	not published	10,226	32,243	70,632	4,895	14.4	145	–	–
2018	not published	10,805	34,125	73,897	5,170	14.3	146	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	649	567	+14%	217 of 408	184	253	−27%	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	706	547	+29%	237 of 404	213	233	−8%	DNV	C
2023	not published	698	680	+3%	204 of 386	213	234	−9%	DNV	C
2022	not published	744	626	+19%	215 of 394	192	253	−24%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,437	815	+76%	302 of 377	179	226	−21%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,593	751	+112%	297 of 387	148	217	−32%	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	667	569	+17%	221 of 394	138	223	−38%	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	878	729	+20%	206 of 361	283	184	+54%	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.