Navalyze · Container · Ship

TOMRIZ A

IMO: 9126754
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,246 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Izmir
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.91 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,664 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

64.0

Container median 182 kg/nm (−65%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−15%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−27%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,542 t

CO₂ emitted

11,053 t

Distance sailed

55,350 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,460 h

228 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 68.2 kg/nm · median 177 (−61%)

78.8Ranks 95 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.3 kn · median 13.3 (−38%)

9.1Faster than 6% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+43%)

7.22Ranks 1,495 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU46%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

371 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TOMRIZ A
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TOMRIZ A
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TOMRIZ A
Container median

16.018.020.022.024.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−4%	+10%	−37%	+18%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−7%	−11%	+25%	+4%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+14%	+1%	−35%	+3%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	−20%	−21%	+36%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	+12%	−5%	−11%	−1%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	+6%	+20%	−12%	+14%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+9%	−3%	−52%	+18%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	991	3,126	14,534	1,752	8.3	68.2	23.3	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	1,628	5,125	23,017	3,148	7.3	70.7	19.7	–
2023	not published	1,398	4,398	18,472	2,410	7.7	75.7	18.9	–
2022	not published	1,894	5,944	28,577	3,318	8.6	66.3	18.3	–
2021	not published	1,743	5,464	21,010	2,422	8.7	83.0	22.9	–
2020	not published	1,761	5,516	23,680	2,317	10.2	74.3	23.0	–
2019	not published	1,874	5,851	26,791	2,950	9.1	69.9	20.3	–
2018	not published	3,542	11,053	55,350	5,460	10.1	64.0	17.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	23.3	16.3	+43%	1,495 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	19.7	17.5	+12%	1,119 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	18.9	19.4	−2%	921 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	18.3	19.1	−4%	874 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	22.9	17.9	+28%	1,111 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	23.0	17.6	+31%	1,150 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	20.3	18.9	+7%	978 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	17.1	20.2	−15%	679 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.