Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN

IMO: 9131797
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Trelleborg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line Scandinavia AB · part of Stena

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

141

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

816

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

174

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (−5%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,106 t

CO₂ emitted

35,022 t

Distance sailed

78,871 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,010 h

250 days, 69% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 139 kg/nm · median 150 (−7%)

69.3Ranks 163 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 15.8 (−21%)

12.0Faster than 12% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 618 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+9%)

66.8Ranks 211 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 109 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−57%)

48.6Ranks 102 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports95%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,916 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN
Ro-pax median

130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN
Ro-pax median

100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

MECKLENBURG-VORPOMMERN
Ro-pax median

4006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−10%	−12%	−6%	−14%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+7%	+7%	+4%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+3%	+0%	−2%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−7%	−8%	+2%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+10%	+9%	+1%	−16%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−3%	+0%	−6%	+29%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+1%	−1%	+8%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	11,004	34,458	79,172	6,339	12.5	139	–	–
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	13,023	41,091	84,076	6,565	12.8	155	–	–
2023	not published	11,735	37,030	81,040	6,346	12.8	145	–	–
2022	not published	11,717	36,943	83,020	6,359	13.1	141	–	–
2021	not published	12,261	38,788	81,060	6,117	13.3	151	–	–
2020	not published	11,086	34,933	80,256	6,018	13.3	138	–	–
2019	not published	12,176	38,367	85,497	6,623	12.9	142	–	–
2018	not published	11,106	35,022	78,871	6,010	13.1	141	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	618	567	+9%	211 of 408	109	253	−57%	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	716	547	+31%	244 of 404	116	233	−50%	DNV	C
2023	not published	694	680	+2%	203 of 386	109	234	−53%	DNV	C
2022	not published	632	626	+1%	199 of 394	104	253	−59%	DNV	C
2021	not published	820	815	+1%	191 of 377	101	226	−55%	DNV	C
2020	not published	980	751	+31%	219 of 387	103	217	−52%	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	760	569	+34%	234 of 394	114	223	−49%	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	816	729	+12%	191 of 361	174	184	−5%	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.