Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

SKANE

IMO: 9133915
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Trelleborg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.57 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line Scandinavia AB · part of Stena

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

147

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,057

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 569 (+86%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

83.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 223 (−63%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,023 t

CO₂ emitted

37,892 t

Distance sailed

81,844 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,421 h

268 days, 73% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 143 kg/nm · median 150 (−5%)

69.3Ranks 173 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 15.8 (−18%)

12.0Faster than 16% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 977 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+72%)

66.8Ranks 296 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 70.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−72%)

48.6Ranks 57 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,171 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SKANE
Ro-pax median

140.0150.0160.0170.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SKANE
Ro-pax median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

SKANE
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

SKANE
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−11%	−11%	+8%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+4%	+5%	−6%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	+4%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−11%	−12%	−2%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+13%	+11%	−1%	−17%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+0%	+6%	+2%	+57%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−11%	−13%	+6%	−14%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	12,217	38,189	85,725	6,597	13.0	143	–	–
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	12,752	40,206	79,413	6,139	12.9	161	–	–
2023	not published	12,998	40,962	84,595	6,558	12.9	154	–	–
2022	not published	12,129	38,254	81,519	6,260	13.0	149	–	–
2021	not published	13,856	43,817	82,889	6,297	13.2	167	–	–
2020	not published	12,368	38,974	83,798	6,219	13.5	148	–	–
2019	not published	12,023	37,892	81,844	6,421	12.7	147	–	–
2018	not published	12,800	40,362	77,253	5,937	13.0	166	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	977	567	+72%	296 of 408	70.5	253	−72%	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	1,154	547	+111%	315 of 404	85.6	233	−63%	DNV	C
2023	not published	1,149	680	+69%	311 of 386	83.2	234	−64%	DNV	C
2022	not published	1,030	626	+64%	270 of 394	77.4	253	−69%	DNV	C
2021	not published	1,372	815	+68%	293 of 377	78.0	226	−65%	DNV	C
2020	not published	1,659	751	+121%	306 of 387	80.6	217	−63%	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	1,057	569	+86%	299 of 394	83.3	223	−63%	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	1,236	729	+70%	251 of 361	143	184	−22%	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.