Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VIZZAVONA

IMO: 9138006
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEXI 27.99 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CORSICA LINEA

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

170

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+10%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

297

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (−64%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

283

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+25%)

Average speed

17.1 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,117 t

CO₂ emitted

34,730 t

Distance sailed

65,229 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,814 h

159 days, 44% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 149 kg/nm · median 150 (−1%)

69.3Ranks 198 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 15.8 (−7%)

12.0Faster than 35% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 429 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−24%)

66.8Ranks 173 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 346 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+37%)

48.6Ranks 230 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU1%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,782 t

8.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VIZZAVONA
Ro-pax median

140.0150.0160.0170.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VIZZAVONA
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

VIZZAVONA
Ro-pax median

100200300400500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

VIZZAVONA
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	−6%	−9%	−8%	+39%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	−9%	+2%	+13%	−9%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.1 kn	+7%	−13%	−24%	+13%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−5%	−8%	+14%	+1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	+1%	+15%	+14%	−26%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.5 kn	−2%	−16%	−35%	−60%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−1%	+1%	+14%	+334%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CORSICA LINEA	8,687	27,220	58,427	3,983	14.7	149	–	–
2024	CORSICA LINEA	10,008	31,338	63,573	4,161	15.3	157	–	–
2023	not published	9,797	30,659	56,363	4,175	13.5	174	–	–
2022	not published	12,028	37,560	74,282	4,477	16.6	162	–	–
2021	not published	11,117	34,730	65,229	3,814	17.1	170	–	–
2020	not published	9,595	30,019	57,155	3,789	15.1	168	–	–
2019	not published	15,073	47,061	87,517	4,966	17.6	172	–	–
2018	not published	13,376	41,791	76,841	4,455	17.3	174	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	CORSICA LINEA	429	567	−24%	173 of 408	346	253	+37%	Verifavia	C
2024	CORSICA LINEA	309	547	−43%	145 of 404	265	233	+14%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	338	680	−50%	119 of 386	324	234	+39%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	299	626	−52%	124 of 394	271	253	+7%	Verifavia	B+C
2021	not published	297	815	−64%	115 of 377	283	226	+25%	Verifavia	B+C
2020	not published	400	751	−47%	131 of 387	317	217	+46%	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	991	569	+74%	285 of 394	197	223	−11%	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	229	729	−69%	102 of 361	441	184	+140%	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.