Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA GERMANICA

IMO: 9145176
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Sweden
Port of registry: Gothenburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line Scandinavia AB · part of Stena

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

171

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+9%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,095

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (+46%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

78.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (−64%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

64.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,364 t

CO₂ emitted

39,359 t

Distance sailed

78,090 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,952 h

206 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 160 kg/nm · median 150 (+6%)

69.3Ranks 238 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 15.8 (−1%)

12.0Faster than 47% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 434 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−23%)

66.8Ranks 177 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 107 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−58%)

48.6Ranks 100 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports92%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,117 t

7.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STENA GERMANICA
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STENA GERMANICA
Ro-pax median

15.415.615.816.016.2

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

STENA GERMANICA
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

STENA GERMANICA
Ro-pax median

4006008001,0001,200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+3%	+2%	−0%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−0%	+0%	+5%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−5%	−6%	−4%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	−0%	−35%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	+10%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−6%	−6%	−9%	+138%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−2%	−1%	+2%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	13,682	43,756	85,785	5,500	15.6	160	–	–
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	13,399	42,958	86,102	5,507	15.6	156	–	–
2023	not published	12,788	40,378	82,077	5,253	15.6	156	–	–
2022	not published	14,107	45,225	85,720	5,453	15.7	165	–	–
2021	not published	13,604	43,539	85,822	5,442	15.8	159	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	13,364	39,359	78,090	4,952	15.8	171	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	15,629	44,112	85,870	5,470	15.7	182	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	15,755	44,270	84,508	5,439	15.5	186	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	434	567	−23%	177 of 408	107	253	−58%	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line Scandinavia AB	434	547	−21%	180 of 404	107	233	−54%	DNV	C
2023	not published	422	680	−38%	138 of 386	90.2	234	−61%	DNV	C
2022	not published	494	626	−21%	175 of 394	94.2	253	−63%	DNV	C
2021	not published	765	815	−6%	181 of 377	84.7	226	−63%	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	1,095	751	+46%	233 of 387	78.0	217	−64%	Lloyd's Register	A
2019LNG / alt.	not published	460	569	−19%	173 of 394	68.5	223	−69%	Lloyd's Register	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	538	729	−26%	153 of 361	129	184	−30%	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.