Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BENCOMO EXPRESS

IMO: 9206712
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fred. Olsen, S.A. · part of Fred. Olsen

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

147

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,095

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+34%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

883

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+291%)

Average speed

26.8 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+65%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,957 t

CO₂ emitted

31,922 t

Distance sailed

67,868 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,535 h

106 days, 29% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 145 kg/nm · median 150 (−4%)

69.3Ranks 179 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 24.7 kn · median 15.8 (+56%)

12.0Faster than 92% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,312 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+132%)

66.8Ranks 344 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 560 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+121%)

48.6Ranks 284 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

533 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BENCOMO EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

130.0140.0150.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BENCOMO EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BENCOMO EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BENCOMO EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,5002,0002,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+4%	+2%	+2%	+240%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−3.0 kn	−2%	−12%	−2%	−72%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.6 kn	+3%	+19%	+9%	+4%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	−7%	−15%	−8%	+20%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+0%	−1%	−2%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	−28%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−1%	−2%	+14%	−58%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	9,818	31,476	67,890	2,746	24.7	145	–	–
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	9,242	29,629	66,286	2,640	25.1	139	–	–
2023	not published	9,579	30,711	67,669	2,407	28.1	142	–	–
2022	not published	8,520	27,314	62,245	2,543	24.5	137	–	–
2021	not published	9,957	31,922	67,868	2,535	26.8	147	–	–
2020	not published	10,101	32,383	69,004	2,553	27.0	146	–	–
2019	not published	14,223	45,600	96,119	3,567	26.9	148	–	–
2018	not published	12,610	40,428	84,097	3,109	27.0	150	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	1,312	567	+132%	344 of 408	560	253	+121%	DNV	A
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	385	547	−29%	160 of 404	1,894	233	+713%	DNV	A
2023	not published	1,365	680	+101%	331 of 386	515	234	+120%	DNV	A
2022	not published	1,314	626	+110%	337 of 394	499	253	+97%	DNV	A
2021	not published	1,095	815	+34%	246 of 377	883	226	+291%	DNV	A
2020	not published	1,031	751	+37%	222 of 387	1,082	217	+397%	DNV	A
2019	not published	924	569	+62%	271 of 394	942	223	+323%	DNV	A
2018	not published	2,207	729	+203%	309 of 361	–	–	–	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.