Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

PRIDE OF HULL

IMO: 9208629
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

248

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+58%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

406

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (−46%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

155

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (−29%)

Average speed

16.7 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,582 t

CO₂ emitted

52,361 t

Distance sailed

66,867 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,015 h

167 days, 46% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 217 kg/nm · median 150 (+44%)

69.3Ranks 352 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 15.8 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 61% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 147 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−74%)

66.8Ranks 104 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 160 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−37%)

48.6Ranks 147 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports86%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU14%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7,435 t

14.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PRIDE OF HULL
Ro-pax median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRIDE OF HULL
Ro-pax median

15.516.016.517.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

PRIDE OF HULL
Ro-pax median

0.05,00010,00015,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

PRIDE OF HULL
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	−6%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2024	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	+8%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	−1%	−68%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−12%	−10%	+0%	+40%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−3%	+168%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−2%	+1%	−4%	−3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	14,573	45,036	67,322	4,006	16.8	217	–	–
2024	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	15,336	48,329	71,400	4,255	16.8	215	–	–
2022	not published	14,867	46,858	66,400	3,942	16.8	224	–	–
2021	not published	14,670	45,982	67,000	3,960	16.9	219	–	–
2020	not published	16,582	52,361	66,867	4,015	16.7	248	–	–
2019	not published	16,680	52,102	69,199	4,123	16.8	241	–	–
2018	not published	17,712	55,187	71,821	4,405	16.3	247	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	147	567	−74%	104 of 408	160	253	−37%	DNV	B+C
2024	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	142	547	−74%	111 of 404	145	233	−38%	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	183	626	−71%	98 of 394	150	253	−41%	DNV	B
2021	not published	567	815	−30%	160 of 377	145	226	−36%	DNV	B
2020	not published	406	751	−46%	133 of 387	155	217	−29%	DNV	B
2019	not published	151	569	−73%	100 of 394	150	223	−33%	DNV	B
2018	not published	156	729	−79%	85 of 361	14,236	184	+7,635%	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.