Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BENTAGO EXPRESS

IMO: 9213337
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fred. Olsen, S.A. · part of Fred. Olsen

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

145

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−8%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,165

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (+86%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

734

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+190%)

Average speed

24.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+54%)

Fuel per day at sea

86.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,229 t

CO₂ emitted

32,793 t

Distance sailed

70,466 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,853 h

119 days, 33% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 148 kg/nm · median 150 (−1%)

69.3Ranks 196 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 28.3 kn · median 15.8 (+79%)

12.0Faster than 98% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,490 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+163%)

66.8Ranks 362 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 890 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+252%)

48.6Ranks 332 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,895 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BENTAGO EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

140.0145.0150.0155.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BENTAGO EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BENTAGO EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

0.05001,0001,500

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BENTAGO EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+5.9 kn	−1%	+26%	−10%	+176%	5.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−5.2 kn	−1%	−20%	−5%	−53%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.9 kn	+4%	+17%	+4%	−1%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.0 kn	+2%	−9%	+22%	+5%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−7%	−7%	−3%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+3%	+4%	−39%	+16%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+0%	−3%	−3%	−52%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	9,323	29,891	62,864	2,218	28.3	148	–	–
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	10,393	33,319	69,593	3,107	22.4	149	–	–
2023	not published	11,141	35,718	73,552	2,663	27.6	152	–	–
2022	not published	10,229	32,793	70,466	2,853	24.7	145	–	–
2021	not published	8,216	26,341	57,597	2,080	27.7	143	–	–
2020	not published	9,153	29,346	59,599	2,162	27.6	154	–	–
2019	not published	14,591	46,778	97,648	3,590	27.2	149	–	–
2018	not published	15,094	48,393	101,121	3,592	28.2	149	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	1,490	567	+163%	362 of 408	890	253	+252%	DNV	A
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	540	547	−1%	201 of 404	1,297	233	+457%	DNV	A
2023	not published	1,156	680	+70%	312 of 386	644	234	+175%	DNV	A
2022	not published	1,165	626	+86%	305 of 394	734	253	+190%	DNV	A
2021	not published	1,105	815	+35%	250 of 377	888	226	+293%	DNV	A
2020	not published	1,099	751	+46%	235 of 387	1,036	217	+376%	DNV	A
2019	not published	948	569	+67%	275 of 394	969	223	+335%	DNV	A
2018	not published	1,967	729	+170%	302 of 361	–	–	–	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.