Navalyze · Container · Ship

NORTHWOOD

IMO: 9222118
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,564 t
Flag (estimated): Palau
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAERSK NORTHWOOD

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,963 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

135

Container median 182 kg/nm (−26%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+109%)

Average speed

16.4 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+19%)

Fuel per day at sea

52.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,980 t

CO₂ emitted

43,627 t

Distance sailed

103,717 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,340 h

264 days, 72% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 96.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−45%)

78.8Ranks 499 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.1 kn · median 13.3 (−39%)

9.1Faster than 5% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 26.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+60%)

7.22Ranks 1,592 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU36%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

13,980 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

733 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORTHWOOD
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORTHWOOD
Container median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORTHWOOD
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−6.0 kn	−17%	−52%	−15%	−16%	6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−13%	−19%	+238%	+13%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2023	+1.3 kn	+5%	+15%	+148%	−14%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.9 kn	−8%	−19%	−94%	+16%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+3%	−1%	−6%	−35%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Maersk A/S	4,107	12,833	42,440	5,257	8.1	96.8	26.2	85%
2025	NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	4,107	12,833	42,440	5,257	8.1	96.8	26.2	85%
2024	Maersk A/S	5,802	18,181	49,812	3,532	14.1	117	31.2	96%
2023	not published	1,977	6,207	14,733	974	15.1	134	27.7	97%
2020	not published	762	2,376	5,937	430	13.8	128	32.0	100%
2019	not published	13,570	42,302	97,473	6,222	15.7	139	27.6	100%
2018	not published	13,980	43,627	103,717	6,340	16.4	135	42.2	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Maersk A/S	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	26.2	16.3	+60%	1,592 of 2,208	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	Maersk A/S	31.2	17.5	+78%	1,479 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	27.7	19.4	+43%	1,280 of 1,899	ABS	C
2020	not published	32.0	17.6	+82%	1,366 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	27.6	18.9	+46%	1,191 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	42.2	20.2	+109%	1,383 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.