Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 5 |
| CO₂ emitted | 30 kt+831.9% |
| Fuel per mile | 72 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 8.1 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.26.2 (+60% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S. | 2 | 26.2 | +60% | 97 | 8.1 | 5,257 | 3.9% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.7.6 (−3% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S. | 2 | 7.6 | −3% | 63 | 8.1 | 2,893 | 8.3% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.7.3 (−71% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S. | 1 | 7.3 | −71% | 55 | 8.2 | 4,146 | 3.2% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S. | Polish Register of Shipping (5) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
NEGMAR TEKNIK GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORTHWOOD | 9222118 | Container | 26.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +18% | 8.1 | 12,833 t | €0 |
| NEGMAR MEKO | 9625451 | Bulk carrier | 8.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −9% | 6.9 | 5,630 t | €108k |
| NEGMAR YAKO I | 9625463 | Bulk carrier | 6.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −30% | 10.2 | 3,738 t | €107k |
| NEGMAR CICEK | 9542685 | General cargo | 7.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −71% | 8.2 | 5,846 t | €169k |
30 of 5 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.