Navalyze · Container · Ship

CINZIA A

IMO: 9226516
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 17,895 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.79 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,653 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

121

Container median 182 kg/nm (−33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+28%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,646 t

CO₂ emitted

23,846 t

Distance sailed

62,979 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,675 h

236 days, 65% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 116 kg/nm · median 177 (−34%)

78.8Ranks 669 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 35% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+24%)

7.22Ranks 1,351 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports22%
From the EU41%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

804 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CINZIA A
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CINZIA A
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CINZIA A
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−10%	−13%	−10%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+12%	+16%	+3%	+3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−7%	−10%	−1%	+2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+13%	+16%	+86%	+18%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	−19%	−23%	−5%	−27%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.0 kn	−1%	+28%	−17%	+2%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+13%	+3%	−39%	−22%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	5,940	18,511	51,160	4,137	12.4	116	20.2	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	7,395	23,038	57,159	4,488	12.7	129	18.7	–
2023	not published	6,432	20,086	55,650	4,526	12.3	116	18.1	–
2022	not published	6,958	21,730	56,254	4,418	12.7	124	17.8	–
2021	not published	3,322	10,367	30,279	2,457	12.3	110	15.1	–
2020	not published	4,323	13,493	32,030	2,448	13.1	135	20.6	–
2019	not published	5,260	16,413	38,459	3,806	10.1	137	20.2	–
2018	not published	7,646	23,846	62,979	5,675	11.1	121	25.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	20.2	16.3	+24%	1,351 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	18.7	17.5	+7%	1,058 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	18.1	19.4	−7%	879 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	17.8	19.1	−7%	850 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	15.1	17.9	−16%	721 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	20.6	17.6	+17%	1,046 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	20.2	18.9	+7%	974 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	25.8	20.2	+28%	1,064 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.