Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

DANIELLE CASANOVA

IMO
9230476
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Ajaccio
Technical efficiency
EEXI 31.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CORSICA LINEA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
203.1 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+35%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
782
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+38%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
631
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+149%)
Average speed
19.1 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+21%)
Fuel per day at sea
93.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
17,275 t
CO₂ emitted
54,825 t
55,673 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
85,076 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,444 h
185 days, 51% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 203.1 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+35%)
69.3Ranks 332 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 19.1 kn · median 15.8 (+21%)
12.0Faster than 78% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 781.61 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+38%)
66.76Ranks 256 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 631.07 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+149%)
48.59Ranks 294 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU50%
  • At berth in the EU2%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (27,302 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.9 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • DANIELLE CASANOVA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • DANIELLE CASANOVA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • DANIELLE CASANOVA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • DANIELLE CASANOVA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−1.3 kn−15%−20%+116%+20%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+0.5 kn+2%+5%−43%−6%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+0.2 kn+1%+2%−27%−8%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022−0.6 kn−14%−17%+47%−23%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+1.1 kn+4%+10%+46%−26%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−0.2 kn+7%+6%−37%+56%Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.6 kn−5%−8%−30%+8%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025CORSICA LINEA17,27554,82585,0764,44419.1203.1––
2024CORSICA LINEA9,39428,24339,4011,93520.4238.4––
2023not published16,02349,79768,8023,45319.9232.9––
2022not published21,69767,69793,9484,77419.7230.9––
2021not published17,11753,43163,7523,14120.3268.5––
2020not published11,27735,27743,7752,28019.2257.6––
2019not published16,64151,96169,2833,57219.4240.2––
2018not published25,09978,35699,2264,96420.0252.9––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025CORSICA LINEA781.61566.51+38%256 of 408631.07253.18+149%VerifaviaC
2024CORSICA LINEA649.46546.68+19%223 of 4041,404.67232.85+503%VerifaviaC
2023not published691.08680.04+2%201 of 386670.36233.94+187%VerifaviaC
2022not published751.66626.32+20%218 of 394703.39252.90+178%VerifaviaC
2021not published977.34815.19+20%216 of 377899.29226.00+298%VerifaviaC
2020not published1,314.57750.91+75%265 of 387716.70217.49+230%VerifaviaC
2019not published840.68569.03+48%245 of 394115.42222.56−48%VerifaviaC
2018not published775.91728.92+6%186 of 361216.51184.05+18%VerifaviaC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.