Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

ORANJEBORG

IMO: 9232797
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 8,222 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Delfzijl
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.16 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wagenborg Shipping BV · part of Wagenborg

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,212 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.9

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

52.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 109 (−52%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,394 t

CO₂ emitted

20,337 t

Distance sailed

74,464 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,298 h

262 days, 72% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 87.1 kg/nm · median 105 (−17%)

56.6Ranks 57 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 14.4 (−22%)

10.9Faster than 13% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−65%)

47.4Ranks 7 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU47%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

449 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ORANJEBORG
Ro-ro median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ORANJEBORG
Ro-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ORANJEBORG
Ro-ro median

20.040.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+5%	+1%	−15%	−28%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−3%	−4%	−16%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−9%	−15%	−2%	+10%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+17%	+15%	+52%	+59%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	−7%	+6%	−11%	−5%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.8 kn	−13%	+3%	+13%	−12%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−1%	−4%	−7%	−10%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Wagenborg Shipping BV	4,655	14,528	53,464	4,714	11.3	87.1	33.1	–
2024	Wagenborg Shipping BV	5,216	16,603	62,867	5,339	11.8	83.0	46.2	–
2023	not published	6,394	20,337	74,464	6,298	11.8	85.9	52.4	–
2022	not published	7,166	22,782	75,964	5,987	12.7	94.3	47.6	–
2021	not published	4,056	12,931	50,116	3,887	12.9	80.9	30.0	–
2020	not published	4,884	15,507	56,398	4,996	11.3	86.6	31.7	–
2019	not published	5,005	15,737	50,033	5,258	9.5	100	35.9	–
2018	not published	5,407	16,993	53,699	5,460	9.8	101	39.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Wagenborg Shipping BV	33.1	95.2	−65%	7 of 235	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Wagenborg Shipping BV	46.2	97.5	−53%	16 of 220	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	52.4	109	−52%	25 of 221	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	47.6	90.6	−47%	18 of 223	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	30.0	104	−71%	1 of 219	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	31.7	103	−69%	1 of 238	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	35.9	90.9	−61%	2 of 271	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	39.7	91.0	−56%	11 of 260	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.