Navalyze · Container · Ship

DANIEL A

IMO: 9238064
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,080 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Izmir
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.71 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,588 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.3

Container median 186 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+160%)

Average speed

9.9 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (−30%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,530 t

CO₂ emitted

4,780 t

Distance sailed

15,570 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,574 h

66 days, 18% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 106 kg/nm · median 177 (−40%)

78.8Ranks 594 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 7.8 kn · median 13.3 (−41%)

9.1Faster than 5% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 54.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+237%)

7.22Ranks 2,073 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU48%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

140 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DANIEL A
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DANIEL A
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DANIEL A
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.7 kn	+6%	−21%	+158%	+51%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+6%	+5%	+13%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	+0.7 kn	−4%	+3%	−65%	−12%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+4%	+1%	−53%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.4 kn	−11%	+88%	+174%	+30%	5.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.3 kn	+12%	−47%	−70%	+11%	5.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	1,700	5,346	16,007	2,062	7.8	106	54.9	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	620	1,946	6,202	589	10.5	99.9	36.4	–
2023	not published	517	1,628	5,485	516	10.6	94.3	41.1	–
2021	not published	1,530	4,780	15,570	1,574	9.9	98.3	46.6	–
2020	not published	3,152	9,882	33,326	3,278	10.2	94.6	52.1	–
2019	not published	1,293	4,040	12,184	2,526	4.8	106	40.1	–
2018	not published	3,860	12,049	40,620	4,021	10.1	95.0	36.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	54.9	16.3	+237%	2,073 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	36.4	17.5	+108%	1,561 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	41.1	19.4	+112%	1,553 of 1,899	DNV	A
2021	not published	46.6	17.9	+160%	1,558 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	52.1	17.6	+196%	1,616 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	40.1	18.9	+112%	1,423 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	36.2	20.2	+79%	1,274 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.