Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONUR G.A

IMO: 9238076
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,785 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.71 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: YIGITCAN A

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,744 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

102

Container median 182 kg/nm (−44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+61%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,494 t

CO₂ emitted

20,263 t

Distance sailed

64,006 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,774 h

199 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 105 kg/nm · median 177 (−41%)

78.8Ranks 581 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 7.8 kn · median 13.3 (−41%)

9.1Faster than 5% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+107%)

7.22Ranks 1,758 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU50%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

723 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONUR G.A
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONUR G.A
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONUR G.A
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+10%	+13%	−34%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−3.3 kn	+9%	−23%	−22%	+24%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−8%	−8%	−24%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+7%	+13%	+65%	−8%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	−3%	−17%	−40%	+10%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.9 kn	−10%	−22%	−25%	+7%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	−1%	+3%	+2%	−11%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	1,956	6,140	18,576	2,380	7.8	105	33.8	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	2,714	8,473	28,279	3,747	7.5	96.0	41.0	–
2023	not published	3,183	9,939	36,227	3,362	10.8	87.8	33.1	–
2022	not published	4,543	14,188	47,701	4,392	10.9	95.2	31.3	–
2021	not published	2,575	8,102	28,986	2,807	10.3	88.8	34.1	–
2020	not published	4,421	13,805	48,503	4,005	12.1	91.2	30.9	–
2019	not published	6,562	20,468	65,053	4,660	14.0	101	28.9	–
2018	not published	6,494	20,263	64,006	4,774	13.4	102	32.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	33.8	16.3	+107%	1,758 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	41.0	17.5	+134%	1,632 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	33.1	19.4	+71%	1,409 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	31.3	19.1	+63%	1,319 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	34.1	17.9	+91%	1,391 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	30.9	17.6	+76%	1,350 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	28.9	18.9	+53%	1,228 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	32.5	20.2	+61%	1,211 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.