Navalyze · Container · Ship

AURETTE A

IMO: 9242285
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,649 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.85 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,260 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

101

Container median 182 kg/nm (−44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+68%)

Average speed

8.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−36%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,735 t

CO₂ emitted

8,537 t

Distance sailed

27,070 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,074 h

128 days, 35% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 94.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−47%)

78.8Ranks 459 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 13.3 (−26%)

9.1Faster than 14% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+86%)

7.22Ranks 1,691 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU45%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

374 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AURETTE A
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AURETTE A
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AURETTE A
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	+6%	−11%	+72%	−35%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+18%	+26%	+337%	+10%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−9%	−6%	−66%	+26%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−15%	−8%	−74%	−27%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.0 kn	−3%	−25%	−32%	−18%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.7 kn	−5%	+33%	+24%	+24%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+4%	+8%	+83%	+32%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	2,629	8,193	27,949	2,832	9.9	94.0	30.4	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	1,434	4,487	16,212	1,372	11.8	88.4	46.5	–
2023	not published	279	875	3,713	336	11.1	75.2	42.5	–
2022	not published	895	2,796	10,809	1,006	10.7	82.8	33.8	–
2021	not published	4,043	12,684	41,533	4,178	9.9	97.3	46.1	–
2020	not published	6,132	19,124	61,438	4,772	12.9	99.8	56.0	–
2019	not published	5,187	16,211	49,534	5,397	9.2	105	45.1	–
2018	not published	2,735	8,537	27,070	3,074	8.8	101	34.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	30.4	16.3	+86%	1,691 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	46.5	17.5	+165%	1,711 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	42.5	19.4	+119%	1,574 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	33.8	19.1	+76%	1,376 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	46.1	17.9	+157%	1,551 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	56.0	17.6	+219%	1,651 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	45.1	18.9	+139%	1,489 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	34.1	20.2	+68%	1,238 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.