Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL MONTREAL

IMO: 9253739
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 26,312 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.97 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,787 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

186

Container median 174 kg/nm (+7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+1%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,958 t

CO₂ emitted

53,594 t

Distance sailed

91,237 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,765 h

282 days, 77% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 148 kg/nm · median 177 (−16%)

78.8Ranks 916 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 22% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+9%)

7.22Ranks 1,206 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU52%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,276 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OOCL MONTREAL
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL MONTREAL
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL MONTREAL
Container median

16.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−11%	−11%	+16%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−1%	−3%	−2%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−3.3 kn	−10%	−30%	−20%	+6%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−6%	−3%	+27%	−12%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	+8%	+22%	−46%	+5%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	−1%	−9%	−7%	+3%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+3%	+4%	+2%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	7,835	24,789	52,808	4,794	11.0	148	17.8	96%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	7,597	24,081	45,614	4,161	11.0	167	18.2	97%
2023	not published	7,854	24,880	46,762	4,184	11.2	168	19.3	97%
2022	not published	10,908	34,545	58,757	4,045	14.5	186	18.3	97%
2021	not published	9,210	29,195	46,382	3,321	14.0	199	20.6	94%
2020	not published	15,627	49,468	85,152	6,859	12.4	184	19.6	–
2019	not published	16,958	53,594	91,237	6,765	13.5	186	19.1	–
2018	not published	16,171	51,160	89,239	6,714	13.3	181	19.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	17.8	16.3	+9%	1,206 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	18.2	17.5	+4%	1,017 of 1,974	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	19.3	19.4	−1%	940 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	18.3	19.1	−5%	869 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	20.6	17.9	+15%	1,024 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	19.6	17.6	+11%	1,003 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	19.1	18.9	+1%	914 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	19.4	20.2	−4%	801 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.