Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

CLIPPER MOON

IMO: 9253820
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 15,932 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Stavanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.85 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Solvang ASA

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,394 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

126

Gas carrier (LPG) median 91.1 kg/nm (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 45.9 (−44%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 10.4 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,003 t

CO₂ emitted

18,767 t

Distance sailed

47,847 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,740 h

156 days, 43% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2024

Set against all 306 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 103 kg/nm · median 80.4 (+27%)

51.6Ranks 223 of 306, lowest first126

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 12.5 (+10%)

9.3Faster than 75% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.8 (−44%)

15.0Ranks 76 of 306, lowest first115

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU43%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

873 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CLIPPER MOON
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CLIPPER MOON
Gas carrier (LPG) median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CLIPPER MOON
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−10%	−14%	−3%	−25%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+1%	−4%	+1%	+10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−7%	−9%	−30%	+22%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	+12%	+29%	+53%	+3%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−13%	−10%	−28%	−24%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+4.6 kn	−11%	+38%	+45%	−18%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Solvang ASA	1,289	4,038	12,554	980	12.8	103	16.8	–
2024	Solvang ASA	3,733	11,682	36,426	2,647	13.8	103	20.1	–
2023	not published	4,295	13,423	37,540	2,627	14.3	114	26.9	–
2022	not published	4,211	13,179	37,047	2,477	15.0	114	24.5	–
2021	not published	6,474	20,245	52,976	3,470	15.3	122	20.0	–
2020	not published	3,771	11,810	34,666	2,614	13.3	109	19.4	–
2019	not published	6,003	18,767	47,847	3,740	12.8	126	25.5	–
2018	not published	4,650	14,539	32,941	4,012	8.2	141	31.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Solvang ASA	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2024	Solvang ASA	20.1	35.8	−44%	76 of 306	DNV	B
2023	not published	26.9	41.8	−36%	107 of 330	DNV	B
2022	not published	24.5	42.5	−42%	103 of 348	DNV	B
2021	not published	20.0	46.9	−57%	56 of 323	DNV	B
2020	not published	19.4	42.3	−54%	72 of 339	DNV	B
2019	not published	25.5	45.9	−44%	83 of 331	DNV	B
2018	not published	31.0	53.1	−42%	87 of 297	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.