Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

FUJI LNG

IMO: 9275359
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd. · part of TMS Group (Economou)

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

332

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+44%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

16.7

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+84%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

103.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,688 t

CO₂ emitted

38,406 t

Distance sailed

41,190 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,162 h

132 days, 36% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 332 kg/nm · median 231 (+44%)

167Ranks 285 of 355, lowest first359

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 14.2 (−8%)

10.7Faster than 29% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 16.7 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+84%)

5.47Ranks 317 of 355, lowest first17.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU62%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

13,510 t

99% of all fuel; 1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

476 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FUJI LNG
LNG carrier median

0.0100.0200.0300.0400.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

FUJI LNG
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FUJI LNG
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.050.0

’192019’202020’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−11%	−20%	+194%	–	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−1.1 kn	+27%	+18%	+36%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.2 kn	−3%	+34%	−60%	−19%	4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-yearLNG	TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd.	2,524	7,396	5,704	368	15.5	443	–	100%
2023LNG / alt.	not published	13,688	38,406	41,190	3,162	13.0	332	–	99%
2022	not published	5,246	15,693	14,025	974	14.4	374	–	54%
2020LNG / alt.	not published	3,044	8,692	10,323	666	15.5	295	23.4	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	7,899	22,129	26,109	2,318	11.3	303	28.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-yearLNG	TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ABS	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	16.7	9.10	+84%	317 of 355	ABS	A+C
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	23.4	42.3	−45%	94 of 339	ABS	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	28.8	45.9	−37%	99 of 331	ABS	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.