Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd.
Ships13
CO₂ emitted236 kt
Fuel per mile177 kg/nm
Average speed14.2 kn
CO₂ at berth1.8%
Ships burning LNG12
Main segmentLNG carrier

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.4

  • TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd.5.6 (−24%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd.135.6−24%17714.22,7121.8%12
Segment median 7.40%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd.ABS (13)100%0%100%0%

TMS Cardiff Gas Ltd.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
KITA LNGLNG9636723LNG carrier17.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+139%13.217,394 t€286k
PALU LNGLNG9636735LNG carrier9.2 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4+24%13.839,801 t€619k
AMBERJACK LNGLNG9845776LNG carrier6.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−9%13.817,547 t€267k
QOGIRLNG9851787LNG carrier6.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−10%15.911,979 t€181k
PEARL LNGLNG9862346LNG carrier6.1 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−17%14.711,206 t€171k
COBIA LNGLNG9869306LNG carrier5.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−24%14.520,442 t€315k
LNGSHIPS EMPRESSLNG9875800LNG carrier5.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−25%13.832,339 t€494k
BONITO LNGLNG9845788LNG carrier5.6 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−25%12.715,043 t€228k
DORADO LNGLNG9863182LNG carrier5.1 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−31%15.819,827 t€302k
LNGSHIPS MANHATTANLNG9872901LNG carrier4.5 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−39%14.622,978 t€351k
VIVIT AMERICAS LNGLNG9864667LNG carrier4.3 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−41%14.45,465 t€85k
LNGSHIPS ATHENALNG9872949LNG carrier4.3 g CO₂/m³·nm7.4−41%14.114,532 t€222k

30 of 13 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.