Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SMALAND

IMO: 9277321
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Madeira
Ice class: IA
Former names: TIP COPENHAGEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

39.4 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

24.96

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (−2%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,227 t

CO₂ emitted

3,933 t

3,993 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,156 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,099 h

129 days, 35% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 39.4 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+12%)

17.4Ranks 1,521 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 9.3 (+9%)

7.0Faster than 65% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.96 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (−2%)

10.14Ranks 1,302 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports62%
From the EU14%
Into the EU18%
At berth in the EU6%

80% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,147 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SMALAND
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SMALAND
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SMALAND
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+4%	+1%	−12%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−13%	−6%	+13%	−22%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+1%	−7%	−12%	+15%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−1%	+1%	−13%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+9%	+13%	+33%	+8%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−7%	+3%	+252%	−7%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	+7%	−15%	+231%	−55%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	1,227	3,933	31,156	3,099	10.1	39.4	–	–
2024	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	1,332	4,271	35,234	3,419	10.3	37.8	–	–
2023	not published	1,347	4,319	31,123	3,240	9.6	43.3	–	–
2022	not published	1,503	4,819	35,186	3,384	10.4	42.7	–	–
2021	not published	1,746	5,598	40,530	3,952	10.3	43.1	–	–
2020	not published	1,203	3,857	30,448	3,087	9.9	39.5	–	–
2019	not published	366	1,163	8,659	962	9.0	42.3	–	–
2018	not published	103	323	2,619	231	11.3	39.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	24.96	25.45	−2%	1,302 of 2,706	DNV	A+C
2024	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	24.58	19.25	+28%	765 of 1,111	DNV	A
2023	not published	31.41	20.67	+52%	853 of 1,045	DNV	A
2022	not published	27.41	21.57	+27%	705 of 1,034	DNV	A
2021	not published	28.98	22.70	+28%	845 of 1,142	DNV	A
2020	not published	26.77	24.50	+9%	680 of 1,167	DNV	A
2019	not published	28.66	24.96	+15%	706 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	63.13	24.89	+154%	952 of 1,044	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.