Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

KANG MAN

IMO: 9277632
Type: Bulk carrier
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Guangzhou
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,411 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

105

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+27%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,976 t

CO₂ emitted

6,209 t

Distance sailed

18,819 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,637 h

68 days, 19% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 3,548 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 87.3 kg/nm · median 86.1 (+1%)

63.6Ranks 1,859 of 3,548, lowest first125

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 10.8 (+12%)

8.8Faster than 92% of bulk carrier ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.27 (+43%)

4.85Ranks 2,736 of 3,548, lowest first17.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU11%
Into the EU75%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

250 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

KANG MAN
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

KANG MAN
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

KANG MAN
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−9%	−7%	−91%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−8%	−6%	+39%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	+15%	+5%	+15%	+35%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−15%	−10%	+4,256%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	+13%	+14%	−99%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2023	not published	206	644	2,362	195	12.1	87.3	11.8	–
2022	not published	2,508	7,887	26,077	2,198	11.9	96.2	10.5	–
2021	not published	1,976	6,209	18,819	1,637	11.5	105	10.9	–
2020	not published	1,505	4,702	16,422	1,306	12.6	91.7	8.01	–
2019	not published	41	128	377	32	11.8	108	–	–
2018	not published	2,583	8,073	26,858	2,305	11.7	96.2	7.12	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	11.8	8.27	+43%	2,736 of 3,548	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	10.5	8.71	+21%	2,643 of 3,968	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	10.9	8.57	+27%	2,509 of 3,466	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	8.01	8.24	−3%	1,471 of 3,150	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	7.12	8.50	−16%	1,096 of 3,384	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.