Navalyze · Container · Ship

VERA D

IMO: 9290177
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,509 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Peter Dohle Schiffahrts-KG

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,194 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

128

Container median 178 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

39.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+104%)

Average speed

16.4 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

50.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,810 t

CO₂ emitted

30,561 t

Distance sailed

76,752 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,687 h

195 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 112 kg/nm · median 167 (−33%)

78.9Ranks 610 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.5 (+18%)

9.6Faster than 88% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (+90%)

7.33Ranks 1,520 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,225 t

7.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VERA D
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

VERA D
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VERA D
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−8%	−7%	+10%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−5%	−8%	−24%	−2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	+10%	+17%	−2%	+5%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	−10%	−18%	−5%	−1%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+10.5 kn	+10%	+188%	+208%	−31%	10.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.6 kn	+28%	−31%	+30%	+86%	5.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts-KG	5,003	15,603	51,515	5,012	10.3	97.1	27.9	–
2024	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts KG	7,211	22,460	64,276	4,034	15.9	112	33.3	–
2023	not published	7,135	22,237	58,542	3,700	15.8	122	38.4	–
2022	not published	9,810	30,561	76,752	4,687	16.4	128	39.1	–
2021	not published	9,089	28,385	78,071	5,069	15.4	116	37.4	–
2020	not published	10,630	33,633	81,836	4,856	16.9	130	37.7	–
2019	not published	3,136	9,868	26,591	4,138	6.4	118	55.0	–
2018	not published	1,888	5,886	20,496	1,711	12.0	92.1	29.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts-KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts KG	33.3	17.5	+90%	1,520 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	38.4	19.4	+98%	1,517 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	39.1	19.1	+104%	1,473 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	37.4	17.9	+109%	1,444 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	37.7	17.6	+115%	1,447 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	55.0	18.9	+191%	1,606 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	29.6	20.2	+46%	1,158 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.