Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

BENCHIJIGUA EXPRESS

IMO: 9299056
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fred. Olsen, S.A. · part of Fred. Olsen

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

169.6 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,030

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+82%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

660

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+161%)

Average speed

25.9 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+64%)

Fuel per day at sea

105.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,177 t

CO₂ emitted

45,451 t

46,147 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

83,591 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,222 h

134 days, 37% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 169.6 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+13%)

69.3Ranks 267 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 25.9 kn · median 15.8 (+64%)

12.0Faster than 94% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,029.57 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+82%)

66.76Ranks 308 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 660.11 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+161%)

48.59Ranks 299 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports98%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BENCHIJIGUA EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BENCHIJIGUA EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

BENCHIJIGUA EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,0001,250

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

BENCHIJIGUA EXPRESS
Ro-pax median

5001,0001,5002,0002,500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.5 kn	+3%	+14%	−3%	+50%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.2 kn	−1%	−10%	+6%	−35%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.9 kn	+3%	+16%	−2%	−5%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.6 kn	−4%	−17%	−0%	+8%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−2%	−1%	+12%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	−4%	+7%	−18%	+29%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+2%	−1%	−0%	−65%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	14,177	45,451	83,591	3,222	25.9	169.6	–	–
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	14,329	45,940	86,620	3,704	23.4	165.4	–	–
2023	not published	13,681	43,860	81,536	3,184	25.6	167.8	–	–
2022	not published	13,531	43,379	83,121	3,668	22.7	162.8	–	–
2021	not published	14,098	45,198	83,417	3,175	26.3	169.0	–	–
2020	not published	12,824	41,114	74,422	2,847	26.1	172.3	–	–
2019	not published	16,391	52,550	90,838	3,912	23.2	180.4	–	–
2018	not published	16,018	51,354	90,953	3,776	24.1	176.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	1,029.57	566.51	+82%	308 of 408	660.11	253.18	+161%	DNV	A
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	688.22	546.68	+26%	230 of 404	1,054.38	232.85	+353%	DNV	A
2023	not published	1,060.78	680.04	+56%	290 of 386	674.26	233.94	+188%	DNV	A
2022	not published	1,121.62	626.32	+79%	297 of 394	680.64	252.90	+169%	DNV	A
2021	not published	1,036.27	815.19	+27%	231 of 377	677.95	226.00	+200%	DNV	A
2020	not published	1,091.75	750.91	+45%	232 of 387	919.68	217.49	+323%	DNV	A
2019	not published	849.59	569.03	+49%	247 of 394	818.07	222.56	+268%	DNV	A
2018	not published	2,396.84	728.92	+229%	315 of 361	–	–	–	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.