Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA

IMO: 9299795
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 75,112 t
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 75,112 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

302.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+71%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.59

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−23%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,483 t

CO₂ emitted

4,631 t

4,704 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,897 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

460 h

19 days, 5% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 302.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+71%)

78.8Ranks 1,989 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 13.3 (−20%)

9.1Faster than 19% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.59 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−23%)

7.22Ranks 830 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU80%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

35% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,634 t).

Fuel burned laden

85%

15% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

5.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.4 kn	+30%	+7%	−93%	−5%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+10%	+10%	+4%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−10%	−8%	+6%	+8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.4 kn	−0%	−16%	+13%	−16%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.8 kn	+1%	−19%	+748%	+100%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	−20%	−3%	−86%	−37%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−2%	−2%	−40%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	434	1,363	1,888	225	8.4	230.0	10.43	49%
2025	CMA CGM SA	1,483	4,631	4,897	460	10.6	302.7	12.59	85%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	15,945	49,799	68,522	5,277	13.0	232.7	13.22	94%
2023	not published	13,942	43,547	65,903	5,084	13.0	211.6	13.46	95%
2022	not published	14,658	46,252	62,428	4,914	12.7	234.8	12.42	95%
2021	not published	12,986	40,969	55,088	3,657	15.1	235.7	14.71	92%
2020	not published	1,510	4,758	6,494	343	18.9	232.5	7.34	100%
2019	not published	13,504	42,252	46,195	2,980	15.5	292.3	11.74	98%
2018	not published	22,998	71,919	76,814	4,985	15.4	299.4	12.92	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	CMA CGM SA	12.59	16.30	−23%	830 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	13.22	17.52	−25%	699 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	13.46	19.40	−31%	632 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	12.42	19.13	−35%	511 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	14.71	17.90	−18%	693 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	7.34	17.58	−58%	194 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.74	18.88	−38%	434 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	12.92	20.22	−36%	426 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.