Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA

IMO: 9299795
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 75,112 t
Flag (estimated): France (from the 2024 report)
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,652 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

235

Container median 178 kg/nm (+32%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−35%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

71.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,658 t

CO₂ emitted

46,252 t

Distance sailed

62,428 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,914 h

205 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 303 kg/nm · median 177 (+71%)

78.8Ranks 1,989 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 13.3 (−20%)

9.1Faster than 19% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−23%)

7.22Ranks 830 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU44%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

13,940 t

95% of all fuel; 5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2,308 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.4 kn	+30%	+7%	−93%	−5%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+10%	+10%	+4%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−10%	−8%	+6%	+8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.4 kn	−0%	−16%	+13%	−16%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.8 kn	+1%	−19%	+748%	+100%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.4 kn	−20%	−3%	−86%	−37%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−2%	−2%	−40%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	434	1,363	1,888	225	8.4	230	10.4	49%
2025	CMA CGM SA	1,483	4,631	4,897	460	10.6	303	12.6	85%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	15,945	49,799	68,522	5,277	13.0	233	13.2	94%
2023	not published	13,942	43,547	65,903	5,084	13.0	212	13.5	95%
2022	not published	14,658	46,252	62,428	4,914	12.7	235	12.4	95%
2021	not published	12,986	40,969	55,088	3,657	15.1	236	14.7	92%
2020	not published	1,510	4,758	6,494	343	18.9	233	7.34	100%
2019	not published	13,504	42,252	46,195	2,980	15.5	292	11.7	98%
2018	not published	22,998	71,919	76,814	4,985	15.4	299	12.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2025	CMA CGM SA	12.6	16.3	−23%	830 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	13.2	17.5	−25%	699 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	13.5	19.4	−31%	632 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	12.4	19.1	−35%	511 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	14.7	17.9	−18%	693 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	7.34	17.6	−58%	194 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.7	18.9	−38%	434 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	12.9	20.2	−36%	426 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.