Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL EUROPE

IMO: 9300805
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 50,911 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong, China
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,911 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

241.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.77

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−9%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−15%)

Fuel per day at sea

65.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,926 t

CO₂ emitted

43,397 t

44,080 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

57,712 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,089 h

212 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 241.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+36%)

78.8Ranks 1,577 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 13.3 (−15%)

9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.77 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−9%)

7.22Ranks 989 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU40%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU4%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (24,679 t).

Fuel burned laden

96%

4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

OOCL EUROPE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL EUROPE
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL EUROPE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.0 kn	+4%	−11%	−16%	+11%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+1%	+6%	+6%	−7%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−8%	−19%	+1%	+5%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−10%	−16%	−5%	−15%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	+25%	+47%	−9%	+23%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−13%	−19%	−1%	−8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−11%	−17%	−5%	−4%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	13,926	43,397	57,712	5,089	11.3	241.3	14.77	96%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	15,870	49,604	68,377	5,154	13.3	232.1	13.25	95%
2023	not published	14,823	46,305	64,383	5,116	12.6	230.2	14.32	96%
2022	not published	15,984	49,954	63,818	4,481	14.2	250.5	13.60	96%
2021	not published	18,713	58,496	67,345	4,403	15.3	277.9	16.08	93%
2020	not published	16,388	51,183	73,886	5,647	13.1	221.8	13.12	–
2019	not published	19,115	59,761	74,929	5,312	14.1	255.1	14.33	–
2018	not published	22,463	70,537	78,623	5,168	15.2	285.7	14.99	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	14.77	16.30	−9%	989 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	13.25	17.52	−24%	703 of 1,974	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	14.32	19.40	−26%	695 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	13.60	19.13	−29%	608 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	16.08	17.90	−10%	785 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	13.12	17.58	−25%	584 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	14.33	18.88	−24%	599 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	14.99	20.22	−26%	546 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.