Navalyze · Container · Ship

OOCL EUROPE

IMO: 9300805
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 50,911 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong, China
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,224 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

230

Container median 165 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−26%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,823 t

CO₂ emitted

46,305 t

Distance sailed

64,383 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,116 h

213 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 241 kg/nm · median 177 (+36%)

78.8Ranks 1,577 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 13.3 (−15%)

9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−9%)

7.22Ranks 989 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU48%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

14,230 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,899 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

OOCL EUROPE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

OOCL EUROPE
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

OOCL EUROPE
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.0 kn	+4%	−11%	−16%	+11%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+1%	+6%	+6%	−7%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−8%	−19%	+1%	+5%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−10%	−16%	−5%	−15%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	+25%	+47%	−9%	+23%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−13%	−19%	−1%	−8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−11%	−17%	−5%	−4%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	13,926	43,397	57,712	5,089	11.3	241	14.8	96%
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	15,870	49,604	68,377	5,154	13.3	232	13.3	95%
2023	not published	14,823	46,305	64,383	5,116	12.6	230	14.3	96%
2022	not published	15,984	49,954	63,818	4,481	14.2	251	13.6	96%
2021	not published	18,713	58,496	67,345	4,403	15.3	278	16.1	93%
2020	not published	16,388	51,183	73,886	5,647	13.1	222	13.1	–
2019	not published	19,115	59,761	74,929	5,312	14.1	255	14.3	–
2018	not published	22,463	70,537	78,623	5,168	15.2	286	15.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	14.8	16.3	−9%	989 of 2,208	ABS	A+C
2024	Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd	13.3	17.5	−24%	703 of 1,974	ABS	A+B+C
2023	not published	14.3	19.4	−26%	695 of 1,899	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	13.6	19.1	−29%	608 of 1,825	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	16.1	17.9	−10%	785 of 1,781	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	13.1	17.6	−25%	584 of 1,797	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	14.3	18.9	−24%	599 of 1,788	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	15.0	20.2	−26%	546 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.