Navalyze · Container · Ship

MARGUERITE A

IMO: 9305893
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,837 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.56 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: VENTO DI ZEFIRO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,388 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

95.5

Container median 182 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+42%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

25.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,051 t

CO₂ emitted

15,758 t

Distance sailed

52,872 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,684 h

195 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.2 kg/nm · median 177 (−45%)

78.8Ranks 512 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 13.3 (−2%)

9.1Faster than 44% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+73%)

7.22Ranks 1,647 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports40%
From the EU30%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

627 t

4.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARGUERITE A
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARGUERITE A
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARGUERITE A
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+0%	+2%	−28%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	−4%	−13%	−3%	−5%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+3%	+5%	−4%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+8%	+8%	−1%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+4%	+9%	+11%	−4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−16%	−20%	−12%	−20%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	+10%	+34%	+20%	−0%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	4,005	12,485	40,783	3,145	13.0	98.2	28.3	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	5,573	17,379	56,871	4,436	12.8	98.0	25.1	–
2023	not published	5,986	18,670	58,735	4,155	14.1	102	26.4	–
2022	not published	6,052	18,881	61,377	4,424	13.9	98.6	22.7	–
2021	not published	5,655	17,639	61,862	4,462	13.9	91.4	22.0	–
2020	not published	4,927	15,371	55,789	4,253	13.1	88.3	22.9	–
2019	not published	6,669	20,789	63,450	4,599	13.8	105	28.6	–
2018	not published	5,051	15,758	52,872	4,684	11.3	95.5	28.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	28.3	16.3	+73%	1,647 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	25.1	17.5	+43%	1,327 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	26.4	19.4	+36%	1,244 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	22.7	19.1	+19%	1,066 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	22.0	17.9	+23%	1,079 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	22.9	17.6	+30%	1,143 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	28.6	18.9	+52%	1,221 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	28.7	20.2	+42%	1,146 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.