Navalyze · Container · Ship

VENTO DI SCIROCCO

IMO: 9305908
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,700 t
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.68 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HILDE A

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,700 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

95.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−46%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.03

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+72%)

Average speed

11.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,587 t

CO₂ emitted

11,225 t

11,401 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

37,428 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,258 h

136 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 95.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−46%)

78.8Ranks 488 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 26% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.03 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+72%)

7.22Ranks 1,638 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports27%
From the EU37%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU3%

65% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,286 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VENTO DI SCIROCCO
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VENTO DI SCIROCCO
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VENTO DI SCIROCCO
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−4%	−12%	−5%	+4%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+7%	+1%	−34%	+13%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−3%	−2%	−4%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−0%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	+4%	+29%	+36%	−15%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	−12%	−3%	+2%	−28%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+0%	−5%	−12%	+22%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	3,587	11,225	37,428	3,258	11.5	95.8	28.03	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	3,912	12,209	39,231	3,137	12.5	99.7	26.88	–
2023	not published	5,511	17,185	59,057	4,473	13.2	93.3	23.70	–
2022	not published	5,883	18,346	61,464	4,653	13.2	95.7	22.93	–
2021	not published	5,757	17,974	61,482	4,670	13.2	93.6	22.33	–
2020	not published	4,088	12,760	45,216	4,271	10.6	90.4	26.32	–
2019	not published	4,586	14,313	44,471	4,658	9.5	103.1	36.33	–
2018	not published	5,195	16,212	50,524	5,027	10.1	102.8	29.77	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	28.03	16.30	+72%	1,638 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	26.88	17.52	+53%	1,378 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	23.70	19.40	+22%	1,138 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	22.93	19.13	+20%	1,075 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	22.33	17.90	+25%	1,097 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	26.32	17.58	+50%	1,260 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	36.33	18.88	+92%	1,364 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	29.77	20.22	+47%	1,163 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.