Navalyze · Container · Ship

VENTO DI SCIROCCO

IMO: 9305908
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,700 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.68 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HILDE A

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,778 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

103

Container median 182 kg/nm (−43%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

29.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+47%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−27%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,195 t

CO₂ emitted

16,212 t

Distance sailed

50,524 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,027 h

209 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 95.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−46%)

78.8Ranks 488 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 26% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+72%)

7.22Ranks 1,638 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports47%
From the EU25%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

687 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VENTO DI SCIROCCO
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VENTO DI SCIROCCO
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VENTO DI SCIROCCO
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−4%	−12%	−5%	+4%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+7%	+1%	−34%	+13%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−3%	−2%	−4%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	−0%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	+4%	+29%	+36%	−15%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.1 kn	−12%	−3%	+2%	−28%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+0%	−5%	−12%	+22%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	3,587	11,225	37,428	3,258	11.5	95.8	28.0	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	3,912	12,209	39,231	3,137	12.5	99.7	26.9	–
2023	not published	5,511	17,185	59,057	4,473	13.2	93.3	23.7	–
2022	not published	5,883	18,346	61,464	4,653	13.2	95.7	22.9	–
2021	not published	5,757	17,974	61,482	4,670	13.2	93.6	22.3	–
2020	not published	4,088	12,760	45,216	4,271	10.6	90.4	26.3	–
2019	not published	4,586	14,313	44,471	4,658	9.5	103	36.3	–
2018	not published	5,195	16,212	50,524	5,027	10.1	103	29.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	28.0	16.3	+72%	1,638 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	26.9	17.5	+53%	1,378 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	23.7	19.4	+22%	1,138 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	22.9	19.1	+20%	1,075 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	22.3	17.9	+25%	1,097 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	26.3	17.6	+50%	1,260 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	36.3	18.9	+92%	1,364 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	29.8	20.2	+47%	1,163 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.