Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

LAKE KIVU

IMO: 9308792
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 2,755 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD. · part of Eastern Pacific Shipping

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,754 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

205

Ro-ro median 108 kg/nm (+90%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

171

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 91.0 (+88%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

Ro-ro median 14.7 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

59.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,306 t

CO₂ emitted

48,002 t

Distance sailed

74,595 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,200 h

258 days, 71% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 99.0 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−1%)

79.6Ranks 243 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 14.4 (−17%)

12.0Faster than 11% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 113 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+104%)

34.7Ranks 432 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports75%
From the EU13%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,515 t

5.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LAKE KIVU
Vehicle carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LAKE KIVU
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LAKE KIVU
Vehicle carrier median

50.0100150200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−4%	−8%	−12%	+3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	−12%	−17%	+6%	+9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	+9%	+0%	+40%	+73%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	−32%	−32%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+7%	+6%	−1%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	−3%	+20%	+30%	−3%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−48%	−47%	−31%	−47%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 48%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.	5,815	18,244	58,734	4,883	12.0	99.0	113	81%
2024	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.	6,810	21,321	66,372	5,230	12.7	103	110	–
2023	not published	7,269	22,171	62,589	4,630	13.5	116	100	87%
2022	not published	4,751	14,838	44,725	3,027	14.8	106	57.8	93%
2021	not published	7,293	22,769	66,065	4,452	14.8	110	85.5	72%
2020	not published	6,885	21,527	66,709	4,437	15.0	103	87.9	–
2019	not published	5,458	17,089	51,420	4,211	12.2	106	90.9	–
2018	not published	15,306	48,002	74,595	6,200	12.0	205	171	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.	113	55.4	+104%	432 of 506	ABS	A
2024	EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING (UK) LTD.	110	55.3	+98%	286 of 335	ABS	A
2023	not published	100	56.6	+77%	369 of 417	ABS	A
2022	not published	57.8	57.7	+0%	233 of 463	ABS	A
2021	not published	85.5	59.6	+43%	354 of 459	ABS	A
2020	not published	87.9	57.3	+54%	357 of 449	ABS	A
2019	not published	90.9	90.9	+0%	136 of 271	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	171	91.0	+88%	205 of 260	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.