Navalyze · Container · Ship

NYK VESTA

IMO: 9312808
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 56,701 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd · part of Columbia Shipmanagement

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 56,701 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

233.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+32%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.89

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−21%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,234 t

CO₂ emitted

13,238 t

13,446 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,112 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,320 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 233.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+32%)

78.8Ranks 1,524 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.3 (+3%)

9.1Faster than 56% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.89 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−21%)

7.22Ranks 850 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU66%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,066 t).

Fuel burned laden

80%

20% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NYK VESTA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NYK VESTA
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NYK VESTA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−4%	−11%	−78%	+26%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+91%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−2%	−11%	+24%	+0%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−9%	−16%	−20%	−10%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+1%	−0%	−22%	+7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−1.3 kn	−2%	−9%	−13%	−8%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.5 kn	−10%	−2%	−1%	−14%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd	4,234	13,238	18,112	1,320	13.7	233.8	12.89	80%
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd	19,899	62,144	81,363	5,495	14.8	244.6	10.27	98%
2023	not published	10,219	32,094	42,586	2,883	14.8	240.0	10.33	95%
2022	not published	8,458	26,383	34,368	2,131	16.1	246.1	10.33	96%
2021	not published	11,527	35,945	42,769	2,444	17.5	269.5	11.46	98%
2020	not published	14,537	45,349	54,635	3,074	17.8	266.1	10.76	–
2019	not published	17,081	53,204	62,781	3,281	19.1	272.1	11.70	–
2018	not published	19,269	60,012	63,526	3,619	17.6	303.3	13.53	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd	12.89	16.30	−21%	850 of 2,208	ABS	A
2024	Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd	10.27	17.52	−41%	470 of 1,974	ABS	A
2023	not published	10.33	19.40	−47%	410 of 1,899	ABS	B
2022	not published	10.33	19.13	−46%	341 of 1,825	ABS	B
2021	not published	11.46	17.90	−36%	435 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020	not published	10.76	17.58	−39%	426 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019	not published	11.70	18.88	−38%	434 of 1,788	ABS	B
2018	not published	13.53	20.22	−33%	464 of 1,705	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.