Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd
Ships37
CO₂ emitted350 kt+9.5%
Fuel per mile115 kg/nm
Average speed11.9 kn
CO₂ at berth5.2%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd24.0 (+47%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd924.0+47%13412.92,6483.2%–
Segment median 16.30%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd5.5 (−31%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd85.5−31%15510.72,6817.4%–
Segment median 8.00%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd42.7 (+68%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd742.7+68%7312.32,3183.1%–
Segment median 25.50%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd9.2 (−39%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd69.2−39%9011.42,0548.8%–
Segment median 15.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Columbia Shipmanagement LtdABS (36), DNV (1)100%0%0%0%

Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
AAL GALVESTON9393577General cargo121 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+377%11.93,513 t€102k
AAL PARIS9594494General cargo60.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+137%12.75,714 t€154k
AAL SINGAPORE9498365General cargo59.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+132%12.98,048 t€239k
AAL LIMASSOL9958755General cargo42.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+68%13.88,093 t€218k
AAL DALIAN9498470General cargo42.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+66%12.41,573 t€53k
PETROLINA OCEAN9460617Chemical tanker58.0 g CO₂/t·nm39.2+48%10.24,299 t€172k
CAPE TALLIN9441154Chemical tanker16.0 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+39%11.45,581 t€159k
ETC NEFERTARI9399612Oil tanker14.3 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+37%11.24,536 t€187k
CAPE SKAGEN9969857Container29.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+34%15.99,880 t€280k
CAPE BENAT9406013Oil tanker7.7 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+22%10.09,100 t€282k
UNION PEACE9339973Oil tanker5.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+19%11.815,572 t€429k
CAPE TEES9441180Chemical tanker9.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+17%11.95,039 t€158k
AAL GUNSAN9393589General cargo29.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+16%11.210,989 t€322k
NORDIC LIGHT9436446Oil tanker5.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+16%11.314,167 t€466k
NORDIC ZENITH9588469Oil tanker7.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+16%10.426,607 t€427k
CAPE FERROL9359325Container25.2 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+14%9.411,169 t€523k
CAPE SCOTT9950117Container24.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+12%14.112,407 t€369k
BANIYAS9838228Oil tanker5.1 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+11%12.27,214 t€0
CL CHARLOTTE BRONTE9943310Chemical tanker8.9 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+9%11.511,174 t€374k
NYK RUMINA9416991Container48.5 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+8%15.38,418 t€243k
CAPE SPENCER9950129Container23.2 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+5%14.110,208 t€310k
SOLAR RUO YUN9907811Chemical tanker8.5 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+4%11.69,253 t€282k
ONE TRITON9356713Container13.6 g CO₂/t·nm14.4−5%13.531,542 t€948k
AAL GENOA9393553General cargo22.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5−10%12.07,560 t€217k
NYK VESTA9312808Container12.9 g CO₂/t·nm14.4−10%13.713,238 t€371k
NORDIC TELLUS9818230Oil tanker5.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.3−17%10.420,621 t€547k
NYK DEMETER9337664Container16.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−24%12.218,089 t€595k
MARATHO9979448Chemical tanker8.6 g CO₂/t·nm11.5−25%11.84,456 t€133k
AAL HOUSTON9958779Other24.2 g CO₂/t·nm35.3−32%12.88,755 t€253k

30 of 37 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.