Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Columbia Shipmanagement
Ships104
CO₂ emitted880 kt−6.2%
Fuel per mile113 kg/nm
Average speed10.9 kn
CO₂ at berth6.7%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentOil tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Columbia Shipmanagement7.3 (−9%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement297.3−9%14610.02,5689.5%–
Segment median 8.00%

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Columbia Shipmanagement29.8 (+83%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement2529.8+83%11011.22,8913.5%–
Segment median 16.30%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Columbia Shipmanagement9.1 (−40%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement179.1−40%9711.11,8279.5%–
Segment median 15.00%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • Columbia Shipmanagement52.9 (+108%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement1252.9+108%7912.42,0253.2%–
Segment median 25.50%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Columbia Shipmanagement8.8 (+11%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Columbia Shipmanagement138.8+11%7611.01,2196.3%–
Segment median 7.90%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Columbia ShipmanagementABS (100), DNV (4)100%0%0%0%

Columbia Shipmanagement: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
AAL DAMPIER9521540General cargo251 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+887%12.03,425 t€112k
AAL KEMBLA9498353General cargo187 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+635%13.04,097 t€112k
AAL GALVESTON9393577General cargo121 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+377%11.93,513 t€102k
AAL PUSAN9498389General cargo65.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+155%14.16,122 t€187k
AAL PARIS9594494General cargo60.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+137%12.75,714 t€154k
AAL SINGAPORE9498365General cargo59.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+132%12.98,048 t€239k
LILSTELLA9794771Oil tanker59.7 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+120%9.57,626 t€265k
PACIFIC DALIAN9339090Container93.4 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+109%10.75,867 t€197k
GOLDEN DAISY9878008Chemical tanker29.3 g CO₂/t·nm15.2+92%9.114,714 t€442k
AAL KOBE9498444General cargo46.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+84%12.45,825 t€177k
NORTH LOYALTY9537771Oil tanker8.4 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+83%11.218,445 t€620k
SAFEEN BARONESS9460576Oil tanker17.7 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+71%6.915,007 t€467k
AAL LIMASSOL9958755General cargo42.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+68%13.88,093 t€218k
AAL DALIAN9498470General cargo42.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm25.5+66%12.41,573 t€53k
SAFEEN ELONA9488011Oil tanker13.2 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+61%7.220,796 t€681k
ALTAI9446427Oil tanker12.8 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+56%9.216,859 t€521k
CAPE GRECO9481477Bulk carrier12.3 g CO₂/t·nm8.0+55%9.51,928 t€52k
ALATAU9416551Oil tanker12.4 g CO₂/t·nm8.2+50%9.318,825 t€576k
PETROLINA OCEAN9460617Chemical tanker58.0 g CO₂/t·nm39.2+48%10.24,299 t€172k
CAPE TALLIN9441154Chemical tanker16.0 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+39%11.45,581 t€159k
CAPE KOURION9481441Bulk carrier9.1 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+38%11.03,253 t€89k
ETC NEFERTARI9399612Oil tanker14.3 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+37%11.24,536 t€187k
CAPE SKAGEN9969857Container29.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+34%15.99,880 t€280k
SAFEEN ELIZABETH9524449Oil tanker8.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+33%10.212,692 t€357k
PS AMALFI9439395Oil tanker7.9 g CO₂/t·nm6.3+25%9.27,135 t€247k
CAPE TEMPEST9407263Chemical tanker14.4 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+25%12.93,057 t€87k
MDS APHRODITE9480708Bulk carrier11.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+24%10.74,082 t€0
ATLANTIC MERCHANT9378929Container55.4 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+24%5.05,539 t€216k
LADY J9957610Bulk carrier6.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+23%10.93,178 t€110k
CAPE BYRON9950090Container27.1 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+22%11.93,968 t€111k

30 of 106 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.