Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Columbia Shipmanagement Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 30 |
| CO₂ emitted | 319 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 131 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 12.5 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.6% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd20.4 (+17% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd | 9 | 20.4 | +17% | 162 | 13.1 | 2,855 | 2.7% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3
- Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd22.9 (+19% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd | 8 | 22.9 | +19% | 74 | 12.9 | 2,044 | 4.3% | – |
| Segment median | 19.3 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1
- Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd9.3 (+16% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd | 4 | 9.3 | +16% | 184 | 11.8 | 1,768 | 11.2% | – |
| Segment median | 8.1 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7
- Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd7.4 (−56% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd | 5 | 7.4 | −56% | 77 | 11.0 | 1,961 | 7.0% | – |
| Segment median | 16.7 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd | ABS (30) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLATA EAST | 9410997 | Oil tanker | 9.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +117% | 11.2 | 951 t | €19k |
| CARIBBEAN LOYALTY | 9501150 | Oil tanker | 8.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 4.5 | +98% | 13.6 | 19,306 t | €324k |
| AAL LIMASSOL | 9958755 | General cargo | 29.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 19.3 | +51% | 13.8 | 5,056 t | €98k |
| AAL HAMBURG | 9958767 | Other | 51.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | +46% | 13.2 | 6,719 t | €110k |
| PETROLINA OCEAN | 9460617 | Chemical tanker | 55.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 41.2 | +34% | 8.7 | 3,821 t | €76k |
| CAPE SCOTT | 9950117 | Container | 58.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +24% | 13.9 | 902 t | €14k |
| CAPE BENAT | 9406013 | Oil tanker | 7.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.3 | +20% | 11.3 | 26,196 t | €301k |
| AAL MERKUR | 9509695 | Other | 27.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 24.4 | +12% | 12.8 | 11,507 t | €178k |
| NYK RUMINA | 9416991 | Container | 15.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | +9% | 10.8 | 8,735 t | €164k |
| AAL HOUSTON | 9958779 | Other | 25.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 24.4 | +2% | 12.7 | 4,247 t | €73k |
| NYK VESTA | 9312808 | Container | 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.7 | −4% | 14.8 | 62,144 t | €974k |
| CAPE MOSS | 9445916 | Container | 20.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −6% | 11.6 | 10,325 t | €186k |
| ONE TRITON | 9356713 | Container | 13.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.5 | −8% | 14.1 | 47,898 t | €761k |
| AAL PARIS | 9594494 | General cargo | 16.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 19.3 | −14% | 12.3 | 7,173 t | €125k |
| SOLAR RUO YUN | 9907811 | Chemical tanker | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −14% | 11.6 | 9,063 t | €165k |
| CL JANE AUSTEN | 9943308 | Chemical tanker | 10.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 12.0 | −15% | 11.4 | 3,280 t | €59k |
| CL CHARLOTTE BRONTE | 9943310 | Chemical tanker | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −18% | 12.0 | 7,778 t | €136k |
| NYK DEMETER | 9337664 | Container | 17.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.8 | −21% | 10.8 | 10,966 t | €211k |
| SOLAR KAREN | 9907823 | Chemical tanker | 6.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.6 | −28% | 12.1 | 2,163 t | €35k |
| CAPE SKAGEN | 9969857 | Container | 33.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | −29% | 15.8 | 6,354 t | €103k |
| CAPE SPENCER | 9950129 | Container | 30.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | −35% | 15.1 | 9,537 t | €151k |
| ETC NEFERTARI | 9399612 | Oil tanker | 16.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 25.2 | −36% | 10.8 | 1,610 t | €31k |
| CAPE FERROL | 9359325 | Container | 28.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | −39% | 10.5 | 13,518 t | €352k |
30 of 30 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.