Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE OLYMPUS

IMO: 9312987
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 69,759 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NYK OLYMPUS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. · part of MMS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 69,759 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

243.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.83

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−34%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

93.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,653 t

CO₂ emitted

33,111 t

33,634 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,827 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,735 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 243.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+37%)

78.8Ranks 1,590 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 90% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.83 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−34%)

7.22Ranks 669 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU53%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU2%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (16,519 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ONE OLYMPUS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE OLYMPUS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE OLYMPUS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+7%	+10%	−20%	−0%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	+7%	+14%	−1%	+30%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−2%	−5%	+26%	+2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−9%	−16%	+27%	−8%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−9%	−14%	+7%	−0%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+5%	+10%	−38%	−21%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−13%	−5%	−14%	−21%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	10,653	33,111	43,827	2,735	16.0	243.1	10.83	–
2024	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	12,380	38,737	54,554	3,502	15.6	226.9	10.87	–
2023	not published	11,741	36,734	55,336	3,784	14.6	212.2	8.38	–
2022	not published	9,526	30,039	44,060	2,905	15.2	216.2	8.19	–
2021	not published	8,239	25,983	34,769	2,109	16.5	237.0	8.92	–
2020	not published	8,527	26,885	32,591	1,872	17.4	261.6	8.95	–
2019	not published	13,157	41,073	52,949	3,175	16.7	248.5	11.39	–
2018	not published	17,505	54,640	61,629	4,023	15.3	284.0	14.49	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	10.83	16.30	−34%	669 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	10.87	17.52	−38%	513 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	8.38	19.40	−57%	272 of 1,899	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	8.19	19.13	−57%	217 of 1,825	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	8.92	17.90	−50%	237 of 1,781	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	8.95	17.58	−49%	304 of 1,797	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	11.39	18.88	−40%	420 of 1,788	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	14.49	20.22	−28%	520 of 1,705	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.