Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE OLYMPUS

IMO: 9312987
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 69,759 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NYK OLYMPUS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. · part of MMS

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 83,245 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

216

Container median 178 kg/nm (+22%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.19

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−57%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,526 t

CO₂ emitted

30,039 t

Distance sailed

44,060 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,905 h

121 days, 33% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 243 kg/nm · median 177 (+37%)

78.8Ranks 1,590 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 90% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−34%)

7.22Ranks 669 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU41%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

757 t

2.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE OLYMPUS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE OLYMPUS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE OLYMPUS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+7%	+10%	−20%	−0%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	+7%	+14%	−1%	+30%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−2%	−5%	+26%	+2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−9%	−16%	+27%	−8%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−9%	−14%	+7%	−0%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+5%	+10%	−38%	−21%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−13%	−5%	−14%	−21%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	10,653	33,111	43,827	2,735	16.0	243	10.8	–
2024	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	12,380	38,737	54,554	3,502	15.6	227	10.9	–
2023	not published	11,741	36,734	55,336	3,784	14.6	212	8.38	–
2022	not published	9,526	30,039	44,060	2,905	15.2	216	8.19	–
2021	not published	8,239	25,983	34,769	2,109	16.5	237	8.92	–
2020	not published	8,527	26,885	32,591	1,872	17.4	262	8.95	–
2019	not published	13,157	41,073	52,949	3,175	16.7	249	11.4	–
2018	not published	17,505	54,640	61,629	4,023	15.3	284	14.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	10.8	16.3	−34%	669 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	10.9	17.5	−38%	513 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	8.38	19.4	−57%	272 of 1,899	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	8.19	19.1	−57%	217 of 1,825	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	8.92	17.9	−50%	237 of 1,781	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	8.95	17.6	−49%	304 of 1,797	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	11.4	18.9	−40%	420 of 1,788	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	14.5	20.2	−28%	520 of 1,705	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.