Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE ORPHEUS

IMO: 9313008
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,984 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NYK ORPHEUS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. · part of MMS

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 84,448 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

258

Container median 174 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.53

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−50%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

104.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,010 t

CO₂ emitted

53,138 t

Distance sailed

66,028 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,909 h

163 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 217 kg/nm · median 177 (+23%)

78.8Ranks 1,391 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 76% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−31%)

7.22Ranks 713 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU49%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

856 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE ORPHEUS
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE ORPHEUS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE ORPHEUS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+2%	+3%	+15%	+30%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−0%	+1%	+74%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−6%	−6%	−49%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−11%	−17%	+2%	−8%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+1%	−5%	−4%	+6%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	−21%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−1%	−5%	+8%	−23%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	11,423	35,518	52,540	3,521	14.9	217	11.3	–
2024	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	9,676	30,222	45,523	3,062	14.9	213	8.67	–
2023	not published	5,576	17,416	26,159	1,782	14.7	213	9.58	–
2022	not published	11,732	36,994	51,499	3,511	14.7	228	8.43	–
2021	not published	12,827	40,419	50,294	3,193	15.8	255	9.21	–
2020	not published	13,195	41,585	52,150	3,114	16.7	253	8.72	–
2019	not published	17,010	53,138	66,028	3,909	16.9	258	9.53	–
2018	not published	15,927	49,643	60,984	3,471	17.6	261	12.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	11.3	16.3	−31%	713 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MMS Bulkship Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	8.67	17.5	−51%	345 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	9.58	19.4	−51%	355 of 1,899	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	8.43	19.1	−56%	234 of 1,825	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	9.21	17.9	−49%	262 of 1,781	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	8.72	17.6	−50%	280 of 1,797	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	9.53	18.9	−50%	291 of 1,788	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	12.4	20.2	−38%	409 of 1,705	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.