Navalyze · Container · Ship

TURKON RIZE

IMO: 9321471
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 14,073 t
Port of registry: Izmir
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: YANKI A, GISELE A

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,073 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

100.9 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−43%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+37%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

279 t

CO₂ emitted

871 t

885 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

2,768 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

257 h

11 days, 3% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 100.9 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−43%)

78.8Ranks 543 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 13.3 (−19%)

9.1Faster than 20% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+37%)

7.22Ranks 1,448 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU53%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU4%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TURKON RIZE
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TURKON RIZE
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TURKON RIZE
Container median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.9 kn	−28%	−12%	−88%	−4%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.8 kn	+52%	+38%	−5%	+53%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 52%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−4%	−19%	−20%	+20%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−12%	−18%	−11%	−4%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	−5%	+8%	−20%	−40%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−7%	+11%	+0%	−12%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−8%	−14%	+22%	+35%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	279	871	2,768	257	10.8	100.9	22.36	–
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	279	871	2,768	257	10.8	100.9	22.36	–
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	3,149	9,851	22,491	2,532	8.9	140.0	23.40	–
2023	not published	2,178	6,789	23,582	2,425	9.7	92.4	15.25	–
2022	not published	2,867	8,937	29,655	2,591	11.4	96.7	12.68	–
2021	not published	3,652	11,390	33,269	2,710	12.3	109.8	13.25	–
2020	not published	4,833	15,123	41,761	3,883	10.8	115.7	22.06	–
2019	not published	5,176	16,180	41,721	4,605	9.1	124.1	25.11	–
2018	not published	4,624	14,435	34,290	3,523	9.7	134.9	18.59	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	Arkas Konteyner Tasimacilik A.S.	22.36	16.30	+37%	1,448 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	23.40	17.52	+34%	1,275 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	15.25	19.40	−21%	743 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	12.68	19.13	−34%	527 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	13.25	17.90	−26%	568 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	22.06	17.58	+25%	1,100 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	25.11	18.88	+33%	1,123 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	18.59	20.22	−8%	757 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.