Navalyze · Container · Ship

HMM BANGKOK

IMO: 9323510
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 62,495 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EIV 28.08 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HYUNDAI BANGKOK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: HMM Company Limited · part of HMM

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 40,453 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

212

Container median 174 kg/nm (+21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−14%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,752 t

CO₂ emitted

11,696 t

Distance sailed

17,738 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,228 h

51 days, 14% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 222 kg/nm · median 167 (+33%)

78.9Ranks 1,293 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 13.5 (+0%)

9.6Faster than 50% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−37%)

7.33Ranks 525 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU42%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

146 t

1.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HMM BANGKOK
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’192019’242024

Average speed, kn

HMM BANGKOK
Container median

13.513.814.014.314.5

’192019’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HMM BANGKOK
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2019→2024	−0.9 kn	+5%	−1%	+171%	−32%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	HMM Company Limited	10,676	33,114	47,996	3,543	13.5	222	11.0	–
2019	not published	3,752	11,696	17,738	1,228	14.4	212	16.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	HMM Company Limited	11.0	17.5	−37%	525 of 1,974	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	16.3	18.9	−14%	735 of 1,788	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.