Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

KANG HONG

IMO
9323558
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
42,691 t
Flag (estimated)
China
Port of registry
Guangzhou
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD · part of COSCO Shipping

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 36,401 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
93.9
Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (+3%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
8.15
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (−5%)
Average speed
11.7 kn
Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (+2%)
Fuel per day at sea
26.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,601 t
CO₂ emitted
8,214 t
Distance sailed
27,688 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,362 h
98 days, 27% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 81.0 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−2%)
61.0Ranks 1,686 of 3,611, lowest first114
Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.7 (+5%)
8.8Faster than 74% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 5.95 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (−25%)
4.80Ranks 841 of 3,611, lowest first15.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports40%
  • From the EU21%
  • Into the EU35%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
293 t
3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • KANG HONG
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • KANG HONG
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • KANG HONG
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025–––––
2023→2024–––––
2022→2023+0.8 kn−7%−0%−9%+20%0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.2 kn+8%+6%−71%+4%Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021–––––
2019→2020–––––
2018→2019−1.4 kn+4%−8%−87%–1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD1,6455,16120,3171,80811.281.05.95–
2024COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD00–0––––
2023not published6942,1757,37659912.394.210.2–
2022not published8232,5978,11670711.51028.49–
2021not published2,6018,21427,6882,36211.793.98.15–
2020not published00–0––––
2019not published3009382,77327610.0108––
2018not published2,3027,18822,0811,93911.41047.27–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD5.957.90−25%841 of 3,611China Classification SocietyA
2024COSCO SHIPPING BULK CO., LTD––––China Classification SocietyA
2023not published10.28.27+24%2,420 of 3,548China Classification SocietyA
2022not published8.498.71−3%1,881 of 3,968China Classification SocietyA
2021not published8.158.57−5%1,518 of 3,466China Classification SocietyA
2020not published––––China Classification SocietyA
2019not published––––China Classification SocietyA
2018not published7.278.50−14%1,157 of 3,384China Classification SocietyA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.